Customers ask AI. It names a few.
A research report on AI search and what it means for a small business. Outside studies only. Every number carries its source, its sample and an A to D grade.
In short
About half of US adults now use AI chatbots, and 42% use them to search for information (Pew Research Center, February 2026). When Google put an AI summary on top, people clicked a regular result on 8% of visits instead of 15% in 2025 (Pew Research Center). An AI answer to a local question names two to four businesses on average (BrightLocal, 2026).
For a small business, that can mean fewer visits from search, a short list it may not be on, and facts about it that it did not write. The parts below show the evidence, where the studies disagree, and what a business can control.
Key facts, with grades
- 42%
of US adults use AI chatbots to search for information. Pew, Feb 2026, 5,119 adults. A R03
- 8% vs 15%
of Google visits end in a click on a regular result, with and without an AI summary. Pew, Mar 2025 browsing. A R08
- 2.5 to 4.1
businesses named per AI answer to a local question. BrightLocal, Sep 2026, 1,300 locations. B R16
- 20 to 33%
overlap between the businesses named when the same question is asked again. BrightLocal, Sep 2026. B R16
- 93%
of the distinct websites AI cited for local questions were business sites. BrightLocal, Sep 2026. B R16
Asking AI is now a mainstream habit.
Pew’s panel survey is the strongest measure we found. It puts chatbot use at about half of US adults in February 2026, and most of that use is looking things up.
In early 2025, 34% of US adults had used ChatGPT AR01. A year later, Pew counts 44% for ChatGPT and 49% for any AI chatbot, with 42% using chatbots to search for information AR02R03.
Pew widened the question in 2026 to cover chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot, so the two years are not a strict trend. Pew says so itself.
Search is still the larger habit.
In a YouGov survey of US adults in spring 2026, 86% of online searchers had used a search engine in the past 30 days and 25% had used AI tools BR04. The two habits now run side by side. Google is also folding AI into search itself: it reports more than 1 billion monthly users for AI Mode, worldwide CR07.
US adults who use AI chatbots
Share of all US adults. Pew Research Center panel surveys.
Past 30 days, US online searchers, YouGov 2026
Pew 2025: 5,123 adults, Feb to Mar 2025. Pew 2026: 5,119 adults, Feb 17 to 23, 2026; question widened to all chatbots. YouGov uses a different base and window, so its bars sit apart. Sources R01 to R04.
Local questions are moving too.
In BrightLocal’s 2026 consumer survey of 1,002 US adults, 45% said they use AI tools for local business recommendations, up from 6% the year before CR05. A one-year jump that large needs the question wording to judge, and BrightLocal has not published it.
BrightLocal’s own product page gives a different figure, 58%, from a different sample CR06. Read both as direction. The same page reports that 18% of AI users contact a business AI recommended directly, and three in four of them check it on Google first.
of US consumers use AI tools for local business recommendations, up from 6% a year earlier.
BrightLocal, Feb 2026 Cof AI users contact a business AI recommended directly. Most check Google first.
BrightLocal, 2026 CFewer clicks, and a shorter list.
When the answer arrives on the page, fewer people visit a website. When AI writes the answer, it names a handful of businesses and leaves the rest out.
Fewer people click through.
Pew tracked the actual browsing of 900 US adults for a month. On Google visits that showed an AI summary, people clicked a regular result 8% of the time, against 15% on visits without one. A link inside the summary got a click on 1% of visits AR08.
Before AI summaries spread, most Google searches already ended without a click: 58.5% in the US in 2024, with 360 of every 1,000 searches reaching a website outside Google BR09.
Local searches see AI summaries often. A manual check of 540 local business searches in three US cities found an AI Overview on 68% of them CR15.
Google visits that end in a click
Share of visits. 900 US adults, 68,879 searches, March 2025.
Pew Research Center browsing panel. Google search only, one month, US adults. Visit-level rates, not click-through rate per result. Source R08.
How much? The studies disagree.
Studies of click-through rate on searches that show an AI Overview agree on the direction through 2025 and disagree on the size BR10R11R12. Each compares a different window and a different set of searches, so no single number holds.
Then two things cut the other way. Seer’s 2026 update shows click-through on these searches rising 85% from a December 2025 low BR13. And Google says total organic clicks to websites are “relatively stable,” without publishing a figure DR14.
Clicks per search on pages with an AI Overview fell sharply through 2025. Whether that holds in 2026 is open.
Change in clicks on searches with an AI Overview
Each row is a different study, window and measure.
Ahrefs: top-ranked page, against a model of the trend without AI Overviews, 300,000 keywords. Seer: informational searches across client sites. Google: blog post, August 2025. Sources R10 to R14.
A short list, and it moves.
BrightLocal asked AI tools about 200,000 local questions for 1,300 business locations over 60 days. A Google AI Overview named 2.5 businesses per answer on average, AI Mode 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.1; about one answer in ten named none BR16.
Ask the same question again and the list changes: only 20% to 33% of the businesses overlapped between repeat runs. Google Maps named a tracked business in 66% of searches; the AI surfaces did in 32% to 38% BR16.
A smaller test started from the top 20 Google Maps results for 100 trade-and-city searches. ChatGPT named 35.6% of those businesses and Google AI Mode 18.4% CR17. These were already the top-ranked businesses; the report expects lower rates further down.
Businesses named in one AI answer to a local question
Average per answer. BrightLocal, 1,300 locations, 2026.
Of the top 20 Google Maps businesses per search
Top: average businesses per answer, one cell per business, partial cell for the fraction. Bottom: the 35.6% and 18.4% rates drawn on 20 cells (7.1 and 3.7). Zarla, 1,851 listings, 10 trades in 10 US cities, one day in August 2026. Sources R16, R17.
AI sends few visitors so far.
Traffic that arrives from AI tools is still a sliver of what websites get. Across 101,574 sites, it was 0.32% of all traffic in 2026 BR27. Across 13,770 mostly large-company domains in 2025, just over 1% BR28. In early 2025, Google sent about 345 times more traffic than the three main AI tools combined CR29.
The tools read far more than they send back. In July 2025, OpenAI’s crawlers fetched about 1,100 pages for every visit they referred, and Anthropic’s about 38,000 BR30. The answer gets written from a business’s pages whether or not anyone clicks.
Whether those few visitors buy more is argued. Adobe’s retail data shows AI visitors converting 54% better than other traffic in May 2026, and the reverse a year earlier CR31; BrightEdge calls AI “a research channel, not a conversion channel” CR32. We found no study of this for small businesses.
Share of website traffic that comes from AI tools
Three studies, three samples. Scale 0 to 2%.
Ahrefs measures share of referral traffic; SE Ranking and Conductor measure share of all traffic. AI visits with no referrer show up as direct traffic, so all three undercount. Sources R27 to R29.
AI writes the answer from what it can find.
The facts in an answer come from a business’s own site, its listings and what others write about it. When those are missing, unreadable or disagree, the answer fills the gap.
Where AI looks.
In BrightLocal’s local study, 93% of the distinct websites AI cited were business sites BR16. In Yext’s count of 6.8 million AI citations, websites made up 44% and listings 42% BR18. A business’s own pages and listings are the raw material.
How often the facts are wrong.
Insites asked ChatGPT and Perplexity about 10,000 US local businesses and compared each answer with the business’s Google profile. Only 55.6% of ChatGPT answers and 48.1% of Perplexity answers fully matched. A wrong phone number was the most common error CR20. Insites notes that some phone mismatches are likely call-tracking numbers, so the real error rate “may be a little lower than it looks.” The benchmark profile can also be out of date.
A vendor test of UK high-street retailers found at least one false fact about 64% of them; the wrong postcode was the most common CR21.
AI answers that fully matched the business’s Google profile
10,000 US local businesses. Insites, July 2026.
News questions, for context
Top: share of answers matching name, address, phone and other profile fields, vendor test. Bottom: answers with a significant problem, news questions, not business questions: Tow Center, 200 queries to each of eight tools, February 2025; EBU and BBC, 3,000+ answers in 14 languages, 2025. Sources R20, R22, R23.
“AI Overviews can and will make mistakes.” It advises checking important information in more than one place R24.
No study we read isolates wrong opening hours, or a business wrongly shown as closed. Those errors still need their own measure.
Some of this is yours to fix.
Most of what AI cites for a local question is a business’s own site and its listings R16R18. That part a business controls.
Within your reach
- Whether AI can reach and read your site. AI tools fetch pages with their own crawlers; a site that blocks them, or shows its text only after scripts run, gives them little to read.
- The facts on your site. Name, services, hours, phone and service area, stated plainly, the same on every page. Business sites are most of what AI cites for local questions (R16, R18).
- Your listings. Claimed and matching your site, on the directories AI reads in your market (R18).
- Reviews, asked for honestly. Every customer asked the same way, never paid or screened.
- What others write about you. Real mentions in lists, local press and associations track with how often AI names a brand, as a correlation (R26).
Outside anyone’s control
- Which businesses an answer names. The tool decides, and the short list leaves most businesses out (R16, R17).
- The answer changing from one ask to the next. Repeat runs share only 20% to 33% of their businesses (R16).
- What a model already learned. Older facts can persist after a site is fixed.
- How the tools change. Citation patterns shifted within a year in the studies above (R10 to R13, R33, R34).
What Still Fox does about it.
We check whether AI can reach and read a business’s website, ask AI the questions its customers ask, and record what the answers say and cite. Then we fix the site and give you the list for your listings. On the care plan, which opens in late November, we check again every month.
No one can make AI recommend a business, and we do not promise it. We report what AI says, what it gets wrong, and what changed after a fix. The business owns its domain, its content and its code from the first day.
The first step is a free snapshot: one page, by email, within two business days.
Forecasts, kept apart.
Predictions are not measurements. These are widely quoted; none is used for a claim above.
“By 2026, traditional search engine volume will drop 25%.”
Analyst prediction; method not public. 2026 is here and we found no check of it. F1
AI search “may start driving more visitors” to websites than traditional search “by early 2028.”
Vendor extrapolation over 500+ marketing and SEO topics, not all searches. F2
News leaders expect search referrals to fall 43% over three years.
An expectation survey of 280 media leaders, read through a trade-press summary that refused a direct fetch on October 15, so unconfirmed. News publishers only. F3
Where the sources disagree.
We show both numbers and say which one we lean on.
- Google says clicks are stable; outside studies show them falling.
Google gives no figure R14. Pew, Ahrefs and Seer measure clicks per search or per visit in samples R08R10R12. The two do not test the same thing. We lean on Pew, the one independent behavioral measure.
- 45% or 58% of consumers use AI for local recommendations.
Both are BrightLocal, from different samples and unpublished wording R05R06. We quote the 45% from the survey report.
- How often ChatGPT recommends a business location.
SOCi’s 2026 index is widely quoted at 1.2% of locations, and another SOCi page gives 6.5%, with no sample or platform split shown. We do not use either figure.
- Does a good Google rank carry over to AI answers?
Only 12% of pages cited by AI tools ranked in Google’s top 10 for the same question, and 8% for ChatGPT R19. For Google’s AI Overviews, Ahrefs reported 76% from the top 10 in July 2025 and 38% in March 2026, after changing how it matched pages R33R34. Seer found page-one Google rank correlated about 0.65 with how often ChatGPT named a brand R35, and our Method page rates ranking as working. Different measures of one question. Our read: ranking helps but does not decide it.
- Brand-controlled or earned sources.
Yext says 86% of AI citations come from sources brands control, yet its own buckets sum differently R18. An academic preprint reports a strong tilt toward third-party coverage for general questions. Different questions; we use only Yext’s local website and listing shares.
Claims ledger.
Every number on this page, with its source, sample, date, method and grade. Quotes are 25 words or fewer.
| ID | Claim | Source | Sample and method | Excerpt | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | 34% of US adults had used ChatGPT in early 2025. | Pew Research Center, 2025-06-25 pewresearch.org | 5,123 US adults, American Trends Panel (probability-based), fielded Feb 24 to Mar 2, 2025. Survey. | 34% of U.S. adults have used ChatGPT, about double the share in 2023 | A |
| R02 | 49% of US adults use AI chatbots; 44% have used ChatGPT. | Pew Research Center, 2026-06-17 pewresearch.org | 5,119 US adults, American Trends Panel, fielded Feb 17 to 23, 2026. Question widened to all chatbots; Pew flags the trend as not strictly comparable. | ChatGPT still dominates and its reach is growing. | A |
| R03 | 42% of US adults use chatbots to search for information. | Pew Research Center, 2026-06-17 pewresearch.org | Same survey as R02. Ever-use question; chatbots only, not AI summaries in search. | About four-in-ten U.S. adults say they use chatbots for information searching. | A |
| R04 | 86% of US online searchers used a search engine in the past 30 days; 25% used AI tools. | YouGov press release, 2026-07-09 marketingdive.com | 1,494 US adults, YouGov Surveys, fielded Apr 21 to May 29, 2026, weighted. YouGov's own article page says 2,000 adults. | used a traditional search engine in the past 30 days | B |
| R05 | 45% of US consumers use AI tools for local business recommendations, up from 6% a year earlier. | BrightLocal, Local Consumer Review Survey 2026, 2026-02-11 brightlocal.com | 1,002 US adults, SurveyMonkey panel. Fieldwork dates and question wording not published; a large one-year jump. Vendor. | Use of ChatGPT and other generative AI tools for local recommendations has grown rapidly, rising from 6% last year to 45% | C |
| R06 | 58% have used AI to find or get a local business recommendation; 18% of AI users contact an AI-recommended business directly, 75% of them verify on Google. | BrightLocal, product page, read 2026-10-15 brightlocal.com | Cites a 2026 consumer survey: n=1,164 (58%), n=673 AI users (18%). Fieldwork not stated. Marketing page. Conflicts with R05. | have already used AI to find or get a recommendation for a local business | C |
| R07 | Google AI Mode passed 1 billion monthly users, worldwide. | Alphabet Q2 2026 earnings remarks, 2026-07-22 blog.google | Company statement about its own product, with a figure: global, company-defined monthly users, not audited. | we've surpassed 1 billion monthly active users. | C |
| R08 | Google visits end in a click on a regular result 8% of the time with an AI summary and 15% without; 1% click a link inside the summary. | Pew Research Center, 2025-07-22 pewresearch.org | 900 US adults, passive browsing panel, 68,879 Google searches (12,593 with an AI summary), March 2025. Behavioral. Google only, one month. | Users who encountered an AI summary clicked on a traditional search result link in 8% of all visits. | A |
| R09 | 58.5% of US Google searches ended without a click in 2024; 360 of every 1,000 reached the open web. | SparkToro, with Datos clickstream data, 2024-07-02 sparktoro.com | Datos multi-million-device panel, Sep 2022 to May 2024. Ad-blocker users not removed. A 2026 follow-up on a different panel is not comparable, per its author. | 58.5% of American Google searches resulted in zero clicks. | B |
| R10 | An AI Overview correlates with a 34.5% lower click-through rate for the top-ranked page. | Ahrefs, 2025-04-17 ahrefs.com | 300,000 keywords, Search Console data, March 2024 vs March 2025, against a model of the trend without AI Overviews. Correlational. Vendor. | correlated with a 34.5% lower average clickthrough rate | B |
| R11 | Re-run over two years: 58% lower click-through rate for the top-ranked page. | Ahrefs, 2026-02-04 ahrefs.com | Same design as R10, desktop only, December 2023 vs December 2025. Different window, so not a like-for-like update of R10. | correlates with a 58% lower average clickthrough rate for the top-ranking page. | B |
| R12 | Organic click-through on searches with an AI Overview fell from 1.76% to 0.61%, down 61%. | Seer Interactive, 2025-11-04 seerinteractive.com | 3,119 informational search terms across 42 client organizations, 25.1M impressions, June 2024 to September 2025. Grouped by current AI Overview status. Agency. | All CTR percentages represent monthly averages across the query set. | B |
| R13 | Click-through on searches with an AI Overview rose about 85%, from 1.3% (Dec 2025) to 2.4% (Feb 2026). | Seer Interactive, 2026-04-24 seerinteractive.com | 53 brands, 5.47M queries, 2.43B organic impressions, Jan 2025 to Feb 2026. Two months of rebound data; the page's own tables disagree in places. | We cannot claim causation. Higher-authority brands are also more likely to be cited. | B |
| R14 | Google says total organic clicks to websites are relatively stable year over year. | Google, Liz Reid, Head of Search, 2025-08-06 blog.google | Company statement about its own product, with no figure or method. | Overall, total organic click volume from Google Search to websites has been relatively stable year-over-year. | D |
| R15 | An AI Overview appeared on 68% of local business searches. | Whitespark, 2025-05-12 whitespark.ca | 540 searches, 6 industries, 3 US cities (Houston, Phoenix, Denver), collected by hand in May 2025. Range 57% to 80%. | Whitespark manually collected data in three large US cities | C |
| R16 | Businesses per local AI answer: AI Overview 2.5, AI Mode 3.5, ChatGPT 4.1; 20% to 33% overlap on repeat runs; Google Maps named a tracked business in 66% of searches vs 32% to 38% for AI; 93% of distinct cited domains were business sites. | BrightLocal, Local AI Visibility Study, 2026-09-16 brightlocal.com | About 200,000 non-branded local prompts, 1.9M citations, 1,300 locations, 60 days. Vendor; the page's own counts vary slightly (1,300 vs 1,342 locations). | Only 20-33% average overlap between result sets on repeat searches | B |
| R17 | Of the top 20 Google Maps businesses per search, ChatGPT named 35.6% and AI Mode 18.4%. | Zarla, AI Visibility Index, 2026-08 zarla.com | 1,851 listings, 10 trades in 10 US cities, one template question, run 2026-08-24. Top-ranked businesses only. Vendor. | ChatGPT confirmably named 35.6% of businesses (659 of 1,851) | C |
| R18 | Local AI citations: websites 44%, listings 42%, reviews and social 8%, forums 2%. | Yext, 2025-10-09 yext.com | 6.8M citations, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, July to August 2025, Yext platform data. The 86% brand-controlled headline does not match its own buckets. Vendor. | 86% of citations come from sources brands already control, such as websites and listings | B |
| R19 | Only 12% of pages cited by AI tools ranked in Google's top 10 for the same question; 8% for ChatGPT. | Ahrefs, 2025-08-11 ahrefs.com | 15,000 long-tail questions, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, July 2025. Vendor. | Only 12% of AI Cited URLs Rank in Google's Top 10 for the Original Prompt | B |
| R20 | 55.58% of ChatGPT and 48.05% of Perplexity answers fully matched the business's Google profile; wrong phone number was the largest error. | Insites, 2026-07-23 insites.com | 10,000 US local businesses, each asked about directly, compared with Google Business Profile. Field matching not explained; Insites says some phone mismatches are likely call-tracking numbers, so the real error rate may be a little lower. Vendor. | Only 55.58% of ChatGPT results, and just 48.05% of Perplexity results, fully matched. | C |
| R21 | AI tools gave at least one false fact about 64% of UK high-street retailers. | Searchable, via Resultsense, 2026-07-16 resultsense.com | 72,000+ questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity. Read through a secondary report; the vendor's method is not published in detail. UK retail only. | 64% of businesses had at least one false fact returned about them | C |
| R22 | Eight AI search tools gave incorrect answers to more than 60% of news citation queries. | Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism Review, 2025-03-06 cjr.org | 200 queries to each of eight tools (1,600 in all, our sum), 20 publishers, February 2025, graded by hand. News, not business questions. | Collectively, they provided incorrect answers to more than 60 percent of queries. | B |
| R23 | 45% of AI answers about news had at least one significant issue. | EBU and BBC, 2025-10-22 ebu.ch | 3,000+ answers from four AI tools, 22 broadcasters, 18 countries, 14 languages, graded by journalists. News publishers are an interested party. | 45% of all AI answers had at least one significant issue. | B |
| R24 | Google states that AI Overviews make mistakes. | Google Search Help, read 2026-10-15 support.google.com | Company help page. A statement, not a measurement. | AI Overviews can and will make mistakes. | n/a |
| R26 | Branded web mentions correlate 0.664 with how often ChatGPT names a brand. | Ahrefs, 2025-12-12 ahrefs.com | 75,000 brands, Spearman correlation. Brand size confounds both measures. Vendor. | The usual disclaimer applies: correlation isn't causation. | B |
| R27 | AI tools sent 0.32% of all website traffic globally in 2026. | SE Ranking, 2026-06-03 seranking.com | 101,574 websites (101.574 in the German original), 250 countries, Jan 2025 to Apr 2026. Detection method not described. Vendor. Excerpt in German: globally the value stays under one percent, at 0.32%. | Auch global bleibt der Wert mit 0,32 % unter einem Prozent. | B |
| R28 | AI referrals were just over 1% of total web visits. | Conductor, updated 2026-04-14 conductor.com | 13,770 domains in 10 industries; traffic from 1,215 enterprise customer domains, 3.3B sessions, US, May to Sep 2025. Vendor. | AI referral traffic currently represents just over 1% of total web visits | B |
| R29 | AI sent 0.1% of referral traffic; Google sent 345 times more than the three main AI tools combined. | Ahrefs, 2025-03-26 ahrefs.com | About 35,000 websites, Jul 2024 to Jan 2025. How AI referrals were identified is not explained. Vendor. | AI sends just 0.1% of total referral traffic | C |
| R30 | Pages crawled per referred visit, July 2025: OpenAI about 1,100, Anthropic about 38,000. | Cloudflare, 2025-08-29 blog.cloudflare.com | Cloudflare network traffic, Jan to Jul 2025 (OpenAI 1,091.4; Anthropic 38,065.7). Referral definition not stated. | it still crawled 38,000 pages for every referred page visit in July 2025 | B |
| R31 | AI-referred visitors to US retail sites converted 54% better than other traffic in May 2026; in March 2025 they converted 38% worse. | Adobe Analytics, via Digital Commerce 360, 2026-06-17 digitalcommerce360.com | 1 trillion+ visits to US retail sites. Adobe's own pages timed out; figures read in trade coverage. Conversion metric not defined. The March 2025 figure is from secondary coverage only. | converted at a rate 54% better than traffic from non-AI sources | C |
| R32 | BrightEdge reports AI search under 1% of referral traffic and near-zero direct conversions. | BrightEdge, 2025-09 brightedge.com | "Thousands of queries and top-performing websites," Jan to Aug 2025. No count or method shown. Vendor. | AI search functions as a research channel, not a conversion channel | C |
| R33 | In July 2025, 76% of pages cited in Google AI Overviews ranked in Google's top 10. | Ahrefs, 2025-07-21 ahrefs.com | 1.9M citations from 1M AI Overviews, top 3 citations per answer. Vendor. | 76.10% of AI Overview-cited pages rank in the top 10 | B |
| R34 | In March 2026, 38% of pages cited in AI Overviews ranked in the top 10, after Ahrefs changed how it parsed citations. | Ahrefs, 2026-03-02 ahrefs.com | 863K keyword results pages, 4M AI Overview URLs, Ahrefs Brand Radar. Parsing method changed since R33, so the two are not a clean trend. Vendor. | 38% of pages cited in AI Overviews also rank in the top 10 | B |
| R35 | Page-one Google rank correlated about 0.65 with how often ChatGPT named a brand. | Seer Interactive, 2025-01-07 seerinteractive.com | 10,000 GPT-4o answers. Correlation, not cause. Agency. Graded B here and on our Method page: a vendor correlation caps at B. | Brands ranking on page 1 of Google showed a strong correlation (~0.65) with LLM mentions. | B |
| F1 | Forecast: traditional search engine volume drops 25% by 2026. | Gartner, 2024-02-19 gartner.com | Analyst prediction; method not public. No check of the outcome found. | By 2026, traditional search engine volume will drop 25% | D |
| F2 | Forecast: AI search may send more visitors than traditional search by early 2028. | Semrush, 2025-07-21 semrush.com | Vendor extrapolation of historical data and adoption rates over 500+ digital marketing and SEO topics. | may start driving more visitors from AI search to websites than from traditional search by early 2028 | C |
| F3 | Expectation: news leaders expect search referrals to fall 43% over three years. | Reuters Institute, via Press Gazette, 2026-01-12 pressgazette.co.uk | Survey of 280 media leaders in 51 countries. An expectation, not a model. Report read through trade coverage; the page refused a direct fetch on 2026-10-15, so the figure is unconfirmed. | not quite 'Google Zero' but a substantial impact none the less | C |
Method. Sources were found by search and read at their own pages on October 15, 2026, primary pages first, with secondary coverage used only where marked. Every excerpt and figure was then checked against the page’s own text by direct fetch; F3 could not be reached and is marked. Studies named in the conflicts list without an ID are not used for any claim. Still Fox’s own measurements are not used in this report. Corrections: hello@stillfox.ai. Version 1.
Straight answers about AI search.
- 01How do I get my business recommended by ChatGPT?
- 02How do I check what ChatGPT says about my business?
- 03What is AI visibility, and is it just SEO with a new name?
- 04Are Google’s AI Overviews taking traffic from my website?
- 05Why does AI get my business hours wrong, or say I’m closed?
- 06Should I block AI crawlers like GPTBot?
- 07Does my website need an llms.txt file?
- AllAll answers
Know what AI says about you.
A free one-page snapshot by email within two business days: whether AI can reach and read your site, what it says, and what to fix first.